A
Anonymous
Guest
I've been waiting a long time for the ABC dictionary to be ready. It looks like it's getting close. I'm happy to see that I can now use my Chinese OS to enter characters. But I still haven't decided whether I'll buy it now, or wait for the next release. My concerns:
1. Instant access works with Notebook, but causes a system crash with Supermemo. (Acer s60 PDA)
2. Radical lookup usually crashes the system. I understand that this is a known bug.
3. Searching is unintuitive for the ABC dictionary. I don't know if it's buggy or intended. If I type "anzhuang" I see an4zhuang1 but I don't see an1zhuang1. I guess this is because the electonic ordering isn't based on the toneless alphabetical ordering of the print version. This is a step backwards, in my opinion. What makes the ABC dictionary most innovative is it's "electronic" alphabetization of entries, which is without respect to syllables. I think the electronic version should do the same. If I type "anzhuang" then it should be the same as if I was looking in the print dictionary. In the list, I would see maybe 3 entries before "anzhuang" and the rest of the list would be all the entries after. The first definition for "anzhuang" (an1zhuang1) would be shown in the dictionary area.
4. If I type "aotu" I see "aotuban," but have to go up to see "aotu." Maybe that's just a searching bug.
5. The entry field is cleared when switching dictionaries. I don't think that it's necessary. But this isn't too important.
1. Instant access works with Notebook, but causes a system crash with Supermemo. (Acer s60 PDA)
2. Radical lookup usually crashes the system. I understand that this is a known bug.
3. Searching is unintuitive for the ABC dictionary. I don't know if it's buggy or intended. If I type "anzhuang" I see an4zhuang1 but I don't see an1zhuang1. I guess this is because the electonic ordering isn't based on the toneless alphabetical ordering of the print version. This is a step backwards, in my opinion. What makes the ABC dictionary most innovative is it's "electronic" alphabetization of entries, which is without respect to syllables. I think the electronic version should do the same. If I type "anzhuang" then it should be the same as if I was looking in the print dictionary. In the list, I would see maybe 3 entries before "anzhuang" and the rest of the list would be all the entries after. The first definition for "anzhuang" (an1zhuang1) would be shown in the dictionary area.
4. If I type "aotu" I see "aotuban," but have to go up to see "aotu." Maybe that's just a searching bug.
5. The entry field is cleared when switching dictionaries. I don't think that it's necessary. But this isn't too important.