A seemingly very sensible change for 4.0 I wanted to get some feedback on.
We think that some of the settings tied to a particular profile now, most importantly the ones in "Scoring" but possibly also other score-dependent ones like (our greatly amped-up take on) score-based subject selection, should be tied to a scorefile rather than a profile, since it doesn't really make sense for the same scorefile to be addressed with two different scoring systems.
You'll now be able to have card filters based on a different scorefile than the one you're currently testing on, which I would think removes one major reason for wanting different settings with the same scorefile - can do a drill or whatever based on a different scorefile without affecting scores in it. But are there any others we're not thinking of? Any good reason why you'd want to have different intervals, different SRS system, different score->subject mapping with the same scorefile?
We think that some of the settings tied to a particular profile now, most importantly the ones in "Scoring" but possibly also other score-dependent ones like (our greatly amped-up take on) score-based subject selection, should be tied to a scorefile rather than a profile, since it doesn't really make sense for the same scorefile to be addressed with two different scoring systems.
You'll now be able to have card filters based on a different scorefile than the one you're currently testing on, which I would think removes one major reason for wanting different settings with the same scorefile - can do a drill or whatever based on a different scorefile without affecting scores in it. But are there any others we're not thinking of? Any good reason why you'd want to have different intervals, different SRS system, different score->subject mapping with the same scorefile?