INTERESTING FIND

[ipsi]

Cool. I'll have to look that up. Also, that is expensive, but not significantly moreso than Guifan or the 21st.

 

[sfrrr]

It is the Practical Dictionary, I just said so. (since my earlier post said it was a dictionary that had been referenced before and that's the only one - sorry if that was a bit convoluted) Not exactly sure what we'll be charging for it yet, but it should be less than the $120-if-you-can-find-it-at-all printed version at least.

I'm ecstatic. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

 

[Henry]

... it's Wiseman & Feng's "Practical Dictionary of Chinese Medicine", C-E and also E-C actually though I'm not sure if we'll be able to get the indexing for the E-C part working, and will only be available for 2.0 (and not until a few months after that comes out).

Bringing up an old thread here, I have a couple questions-

1. Will the E-C indexing be working for this dictionary when it is released?

2. Will the release coincide with that of 2.0 or are they separate?

Thanks, Henry

 

[mikelove]

Not sure if we'll have regular E-C search as with a normal E-C dictionary, but it should work with full-text search at least. (the E-C headers are kind of tricky on a PDA anyway since they tend to be extremely long)

Also not sure about the release, partly because we might like to get those headwords working - probably at least a little while after 2.0 since it's tough to justify holding up the release of that for the sake of one specialized dictionary, but hopefully not too much later.