I am working on some basic flash cards based on the Huang and Stimson Written Chinese series. 2 questions. These all take place when traditional is selected in the toolbar above.
1st question from WSC chap 42:
The character 衝 chong1, collide, rush, as in 衝壞,(destroy by colliding/rushing against), this simplified should be 冲坏.
When I look up chong, I only find chong4, listed as 衝. However, if I look at chong1, 沖(simplified 冲) then definition 3 has in parentheses (衝), and also the english as charge, rush, dash. So can you explain why 衝 does not appear separately when searching on chong1? Does this mean that 衝 is a variant for the purposes of definition 3?
2nd question
製造的製. if I look up zhi4, I can find 制 which has in parentheses after 1 (製). Does this mean it's a variant? WSC chapter 41 shows 制 as the simplified for 製. and so does zhongwen.com. Oddly enough if I search on the pinyin, zhizao, then I come up with 製造. deleteing the 造, i.e. leaving 製 by itself then turns up
製版 but nothing for 製 alone.
Thanks.
p.s. I am not sure why i picked that title for this post... it made sense at the time.
1st question from WSC chap 42:
The character 衝 chong1, collide, rush, as in 衝壞,(destroy by colliding/rushing against), this simplified should be 冲坏.
When I look up chong, I only find chong4, listed as 衝. However, if I look at chong1, 沖(simplified 冲) then definition 3 has in parentheses (衝), and also the english as charge, rush, dash. So can you explain why 衝 does not appear separately when searching on chong1? Does this mean that 衝 is a variant for the purposes of definition 3?
2nd question
製造的製. if I look up zhi4, I can find 制 which has in parentheses after 1 (製). Does this mean it's a variant? WSC chapter 41 shows 制 as the simplified for 製. and so does zhongwen.com. Oddly enough if I search on the pinyin, zhizao, then I come up with 製造. deleteing the 造, i.e. leaving 製 by itself then turns up
製版 but nothing for 製 alone.
Thanks.
p.s. I am not sure why i picked that title for this post... it made sense at the time.